Kainos Annual Report 2022
93
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2.
Conclusions relating to going concern
The directors have prepared the financial statements on the
going concern basis as they do not intend to liquidate the Group
or the Company or to cease their operations, and as they have
concluded that the Group and the Company’s financial position
means that this is realistic. They have also concluded that there
are no material uncertainties that could have cast significant
doubt over their ability to continue as a going concern for at
least a year from the date of approval of the financial statements
(“the going concern period”).
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the
directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the
preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. Our
evaluation of the directors' assessment of the Group and
Company’s ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis
of accounting included:
— Obtaining an understanding of the inherent risks to the
Group's and Company's business model and analysed how
those risks might affect the Group and Company's financial
resources or ability to continue operations over the going
concern period.
—
Obtaining an understanding of the directors’ use of the going
concern basis of preparation. This included inspecting their
going concern assessment and associated underlying
forecasts and assumptions, and performing inquiries of
management and those charged with governance.
—
Assessing the appropriateness of key assumptions made in
the Group’s business plan, by comparing them to historical
performance and challenging the achievability of budgeted
growth.
—
Testing the clerical accuracy of the going concern model
including the data used in stress testing.
—
We also compared past budgets to actual results to assess the
directors' track record of budgeting accurately.
—
We considered whether the going concern disclosure in note
3 to the Group financial statements gives an appropriate and
sufficient description of the directors' assessment of going
concern.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identified
any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that,
individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the
Group or the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern
for a period of at least twelve months from the date when the
financial statements are authorised for issue.
In relation to the Group and the Company’s reporting on how
they have applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have
nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation to the
directors’ statement in the financial statements about whether
the directors considered it appropriate to adopt the going
concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the directors with
respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of
this report.
However, as we cannot predict all future events or conditions
and as subsequent events may result in outcomes that are
inconsistent with judgements that were reasonable at the time
they were made, the absence of reference to a material
uncertainty in this auditor's report is not a guarantee that the
Group or the Company will continue in operation.
3.
Detecting irregularities including fraud
We identified the areas of laws and regulations that could
reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the financial
statements and risks of material misstatement due to fraud,
using our understanding of the entity's industry, regulatory
environment and other external factors and inquiry with the
directors. In addition, our risk assessment procedures included:
— Inquiring with the directors and other management as to the
Group’s policies and procedures regarding compliance with
laws and regulations, identifying, evaluating and accounting
for litigation and claims, as well as whether they have
knowledge of non-compliance or instances of litigation or
claims.
—
Inquiring of directors as to the Group’s high-level policies
and procedures to prevent and detect fraud, as well as
whether they have knowledge of any actual, suspected or
alleged fraud.
—
Inquiring of directors regarding their assessment of the risk
that the financial statements may be materially misstated due
to irregularities, including fraud.
—
Inspecting the Group’s regulatory and legal correspondence.
—
Reading Board, audit committee, remuneration committee
and nomination committee meeting minutes.
—
Performing planning analytical procedures to identify any
usual or unexpected relationships.
We discussed identified laws and regulations, fraud risk factors
and the need to remain alert among the audit team.
Firstly, the Group is subject to laws and regulations that directly
affect the financial statements including companies and financial
reporting legislation, taxation legislation and distributable profits
legislation. We assessed the extent of compliance with these laws
and regulations as part of our procedures on the related financial
statement items, including assessing the financial statement
disclosures and agreeing them to supporting documentation
when necessary.
Secondly, the Group is subject to many other laws and
regulations where the consequences of non-compliance could
have a material effect on amounts or disclosures in the financial
statements, for instance through the imposition of fines or
litigation. We identified the following areas as those most likely
to have such an effect: health and safety, anti-bribery,
employment law, environmental law and certain aspects of
company legislation recognising the nature of the Group’s
activities.
Auditing standards limit the required audit procedures to identify
non-compliance with these non-direct laws and regulations to
inquiry of the directors and other management and inspection of
regulatory and legal correspondence, if any. These limited
procedures did not identify actual or suspected non-compliance.
We assessed events or conditions that could indicate an incentive
or pressure to commit fraud or provide an opportunity to commit
fraud. As required by auditing standards, we performed
procedures to address the risk of management override of
controls and the risk of fraudulent revenue recognition. We
identified a fraud risk in relation to the Group revenue
recognition relating to misstatement of accrued income and
deferred income.